Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Hitler didn't use chemical weapons, claims Trump administration via Spicer statement

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Par10 View Post

    Aren't you one of those people that have been comparing Trump to Hitler for the last year or so?
    The Assad family has been in charge for 40 years. The civil war has been going on for 6 years. In that time there has been opportunity for clarity. Trump still has a chance!

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Par10 View Post

      Really? The most terrible comparison ever? Are you sure about that because I can think of several just off the top of my head.
      Bush is the next Hitler
      Obama is as bad as Stalin
      Trump is Hitler incarnate

      Or, maybe I took what you said just a bit too literally, just like the press did. It's all stupid games to sell news.
      You took that too literally on purpose, and completely non relevant.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by posthuman View Post
        Wait so we're supposed to call Assad "worse than Hitler" because he droppped a barrel bomb on a neighborhood instead of rounding everyone in the neighborhood up, getting their personal information, stealing their property right down to the gold fillings, working and starving them to death and then gassing them and burning their remains? The somewhat indiscriminate nature of military chemical weapons use is worse than rounding up and torturing your citizens to death? That's the hard truth here? You idiots are lucky we have a first amendment because you have not earned the right to have opinions
        Um, they burned the remains to help fight disease among the other concentration camp prisoners. But do you give them credit for that? Nooooooo...that's a bad thing to you. Idiot.

        Comment


        • #34
          Where was the left's outrage when Chris Matthews said the exact same thing in 2013?
          http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid...l_weapons.html

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by pete rose haircut View Post
            Where was the left's outrage when Chris Matthews said the exact same thing in 2013?
            http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid...l_weapons.html
            Was Chris Matthews Obama's press secretary? Was he essentially speaking for the president?

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by spudoc View Post

              Was Chris Matthews Obama's press secretary? Was he essentially speaking for the president?
              And? Two people say the exact same thing and your level of outrage is different depending upon who said it? Why?

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by pete rose haircut View Post

                And? Two people say the exact same thing and your level of outrage is different depending upon who said it? Why?
                Because one is a talking head paid to make outrageous statements for ratings, the other is essentially the nation's spokesman.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Satyrday View Post
                  You took that too literally on purpose, and completely non relevant.
                  Absolutely on purpose. You make a stupid comparison about how others make stupid comparisons and you don't think it's relevant?

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Par10 View Post

                    Absolutely on purpose. You make a stupid comparison about how others make stupid comparisons and you don't think it's relevant?
                    You made a stupid comment on how media spins the comparison Spicer made, when there is no spin or anything to take literally about it.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by posthuman View Post

                      Because one is a talking head paid to make outrageous statements for ratings, the other is essentially the nation's spokesman.
                      Said talking head actually works for the network that's the worst offender at fake outrage and virtue signaling. The hypocrisy callout is valid.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Porter View Post

                        Said talking head actually works for the network that's the worst offender at fake outrage and virtue signaling. The hypocrisy callout is valid.
                        "One is a talking head for a network and the other is a spokesman for the President."

                        Porter: "Actually one is a spokesman for the network I think is the worst so I say its the same thing...wahhhh!"

                        Noted dipshit. Run along now.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X