Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The GOP's problem with women is that they've finally been outed

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by posthuman View Post

    Ted Kennedy died 8 years ago. Bill Clinton left public service 16 years ago. Anthony Weiner...held office?

    yeah, based on your examples I can see how you can go on all day. You haven't been able to get their names out of your mouth your entire life. The Republicans have issues right now. Go on all day about them.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Weiner

    Comment


    • #17
      ^^^^ post apparently thinks Roger Ailes and Bill O'Reilly held elected office too, he really has the dumb today.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by on2muchcoffee View Post
        I didn't say Trumpeteers. You have folks on the right who are just as immoral as the left.
        Totally tribal and play everything as a team sport. No applied standards beyond my team gets a pass and yours is wrong...just basic BS that continues to tear society down.


        Luckily, not everyone does yet. That's what I was pointing out.
        The problem is that with the examples in this thread....Trump, Ailes and OReilly....they "dropped" by becoming President and the other two receiving Multi-million dollar payouts(Oreilly will likely receive a huge payout as well) ....so the idea that it was an indication of some good being left really doesn't make much sense. So basically the sense that they had morals to begin with or that they "dropped" as a result of going against those morals really holds no water.

        Comment


        • #19

          Comment


          • #20
            Thats incredibly dumb; even for you. ^^^

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by stymiegreen View Post

              The problem is that with the examples in this thread....Trump, Ailes and OReilly....they "dropped" by becoming President and the other two receiving Multi-million dollar payouts(Oreilly will likely receive a huge payout as well) ....so the idea that it was an indication of some good being left really doesn't make much sense. So basically the sense that they had morals to begin with or that they "dropped" as a result of going against those morals really holds no water.
              Ooohhh. You want to absolutely punish people. Wreck their lives in totality.

              Got it.
              Well, the courts can try do that. We can only drive them out. A little shunning, so to speak.
              If I somehow get the power to absolutely destroy those I think have wronged others, you'll certainly know.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by on2muchcoffee View Post
                Ooohhh. You want to absolutely punish people. Wreck their lives in totality.

                Got it.
                Well, the courts can try do that. We can only drive them out. A little shunning, so to speak.
                If I somehow get the power to absolutely destroy those I think have wronged others, you'll certainly know.
                Dude...have you completely shut your brain off? A guy that was on tape saying he grabs womens pussies became President and the guys at Fox both received/will receive mega millions for having been fired for sexual harassment and you interpreted that as me "wanting to wreck their lives in totality". In what universe has what happened to them even approached that? What in the good fuck are you even talking about? Holy fuck lol

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by pete rose haircut View Post
                  ^^^^ post apparently thinks Roger Ailes and Bill O'Reilly held elected office too, he really has the dumb today.
                  They're just the latest examples of how GOP standards deprive women of equal footing. The current President and VP have track records that would put your democratic examples to shame. Pence, for example, may as well include Sharia in his policies. Single women aren't allowed to work with him indicidually? Fucking crazy.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by stymiegreen View Post

                    Dude...have you completely shut your brain off? A guy that was on tape saying he grabs womens pussies became President and the guys at Fox both received/will receive mega millions for having been fired for sexual harassment and you interpreted that as me "wanting to wreck their lives in totality". In what universe has what happened to them even approached that? What in the good fuck are you even talking about? Holy fuck lol
                    Are they working?
                    Other than the dirty, lewd talking Orange guy, are they still at Fox?
                    You seem to think the mere accusation is enough to break contracts and kick them into the gutter.
                    You even managed to run off one Presidential candidate based on accusations.
                    That might be why Trump got a pass from his followers, but those cases are still pending, no?


                    Comment


                    • #25
                      This is exactly why Pence thinks it's not a good idea to be alone with a woman he's not related to.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by on2muchcoffee View Post

                        Are they working?
                        Other than the dirty, lewd talking Orange guy, are they still at Fox?
                        You seem to think the mere accusation is enough to break contracts and kick them into the gutter.
                        You even managed to run off one Presidential candidate based on accusations.
                        That might be why Trump got a pass from his followers, but those cases are still pending, no?

                        So you're saying Fox had no evidence and did no investigations they just ran both of them off on "mere accusations"? That's what you're going with, really? And getting 40 million and probably around 25 million respectively is being "kicked into the gutter"? Can you discuss anything without extreme hyperbole anymore? Lol.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by stymiegreen View Post

                          So you're saying Fox had no evidence and did no investigations they just ran both of them off on "mere accusations"? That's what you're going with, really? And getting 40 million and probably around 25 million respectively is being "kicked into the gutter"? Can you discuss anything without extreme hyperbole anymore? Lol.
                          "Fox" settled out of court on behalf of them. So whatever proof they had they've kept secret. As I said in the Oreilly post in GD, either Fox did him a great injustice by not defending him, or he's an asshat (maybe a little of both).
                          But I'm not omniscient, so I can't tell you which.
                          Either way, Fox evidentally did not find the "evidence" compelling enough to qualify for breaking their contracts.
                          You, on the other hand, have assumed guilt based only on accusations and want their contracts broken....again, 'cause you don't like them.
                          You have a habit of doing that.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by on2muchcoffee View Post
                            "Fox" settled out of court on behalf of them. So whatever proof they had they've kept secret. As I said in the Oreilly post in GD, either Fox did him a great injustice by not defending him, or he's an asshat (maybe a little of both).
                            But I'm not omniscient, so I can't tell you which.
                            Either way, Fox evidentally did not find the "evidence" compelling enough to qualify for breaking their contracts.
                            You, on the other hand, have assumed guilt based only on accusations and want their contracts broken....again, 'cause you don't like them.
                            You have a habit of doing that.
                            You have again attributed something to me that I never said. You have a habit of doing that. I mentioned the examples in the thread because it was the one you responded in as an example of why there is still good in Republicans because they claim to have morals. And all I did was report the FACTS of why what happened to the examples in this thread did not jibe with your contention. Then you morphed that into me "wanting" their contracts broken based on what you perceive is my assumption of their guilt. I was asking you if that was what you were going with...meaning is that what your contention is about their guilt. I made no affirmations about anything. You are just making shit up like you usually do.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by stymiegreen View Post

                              You have again attributed something to me that I never said. You have a habit of doing that. I mentioned the examples in the thread because it was the one you responded in as an example of why there is still good in Republicans because they claim to have morals. And all I did was report the FACTS of why what happened to the examples in this thread did not jibe with your contention. Then you morphed that into me "wanting" their contracts broken based on what you perceive is my assumption of their guilt. I was asking you if that was what you were going with...meaning is that what your contention is about their guilt. I made no affirmations about anything. You are just making shit up like you usually do.
                              Are they at Fox? Did they lose their jobs?
                              I keep asking that and you continue to shift around about PAYOUTS!!!!!

                              ARE THEY STILL AT FOX?

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by on2muchcoffee View Post
                                Are they at Fox? Did they lose their jobs?
                                I keep asking that and you continue to shift around about PAYOUTS!!!!!

                                ARE THEY STILL AT FOX?
                                I didn't "shift" to anything. I simply recapped how the conversation went which was contradictory to what you claimed I said. I'm beginning to wonder if you're even reading the words on the screen anymore.

                                They are both no longer at Fox. Fox claims they did an investigation and it was enough to part ways but not enough to attempt to withhold their money. I didn't do my own investigation so I really have no idea whether Fox's ultimate decision has merit or not. That sure hasn't prevented you from telling me what I "want" to happen to their contracts though.

                                Point remains...none of what you have contended about them "dropping" holds any water. Even if Fox had ZERO evidence and parted ways based only on how it appeared for them with a bunch of women coming forward with accusations...awarding them mega millions as a result is hardly something I would find sympathetic. I guess you have a bleeding heart for the poor millionaires that you think were railroaded? That is a question. Not an indication of what I think or "want" to happen.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X