Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Alt-Left targets FCC chairman

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by CHEEZY08 View Post
    Wait, so Vanity Fair is making it up?
    Lots of outlets making all kinds of shit up it appears

    Comment


    • #17
      The Alt-Left has even raised its ugly, immature head in Nebraska FFS! I find the sign incredibly ironic after 8 years of the Dems...loL!

      http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...sters-for-sca/

      Comment


      • #18
        Didn't we already do this thread? The alt-left exists as a concept. Created as a false equivalency to the alt-right. Some people have decided to adopt the term but there's no clear, agreed upon definition. Likely because there's no actual, concrete group or movement that constitutes the "alt-left".

        Here's a fun Google exercise: look up where the term "alt-left" came from. Then look up where the term "alt-right" came from. What do you find?

        Comment


        • #19
          If anyone needs targeting, it's this POS Ajit Pai.





          Comment


          • #20
            Update:

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by biker View Post

              Lots of outlets making all kinds of shit up it appears
              So just gonna ignore the fact that you are using the term to mean the opposite of what the vanity fare article says it means?

              Comment


              • #22
                As I said in that other thread...its very similar to the media bias argument:

                There is no man in charge calling secret meetings and coordinating attacks; therefore there is no media bias.
                There is no exact definition, direction or man in charge...therefore there is no Alt-Left.

                lolz

                Ignore it all you want. They aint going away.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by CHEEZY08 View Post
                  As I said in that other thread...its very similar to the media bias argument:

                  There is no man in charge calling secret meetings and coordinating attacks; therefore there is no media bias.
                  There is no exact definition, direction or man in charge...therefore there is no Alt-Left.

                  lolz

                  Ignore it all you want. They aint going away.
                  So biker calling the "alt-left" fascist then posting an article from and anti-fascist "alt-left" group should have no bearing on your understanding of the definition? Or him posting a vanity fare article that says the alt-left is against identity politics when he also posted a thread from an ultra pc liberal and called them alt-left too? You're full of shit just like he is. Everything you don't like that libruls do is now "alt-left" cause that's what you parroted from the right wing sites that said the same. You have no logic or ground to stand on. You're nonsense.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by CHEEZY08 View Post
                    As I said in that other thread...its very similar to the media bias argument:

                    There is no man in charge calling secret meetings and coordinating attacks; therefore there is no media bias.
                    There is no exact definition, direction or man in charge...therefore there is no Alt-Left.

                    lolz

                    Ignore it all you want. They aint going away.
                    It was a dumb argument then and it's a dumb argument now. Y'all are trying to wish it into existence, but again, it doesn't actually exist as any sort of cohesive group or movement. I mean, you guys can't even define what it is.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Think about this because it is the direct answer to your problem accepting its existence: It is NOT a cohesive group or movement. Thats the point. And just like before...since there is no single man in charge or one singular direction IT MUST NOT EXIST!!!11!11!!!!
                      lolz

                      There are never going to be gigantic secret meetings with the grand poobah coordinating resistance movements across the country. What there will be is any number of groups loosely aligned by one thing: a concrete resolve to resist any and everything Trump related. Some will be violent. Some won't. Some will push hard for "X". Some will push hard for "Y".

                      The Alt-Left is just an opaque label for all of these things. Its not meant to be a label for some giant singular ubiquitous Lefty entity.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by stymiegreen View Post
                        You got that right, pal. Lulz.
                        Lulz

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by CHEEZY08 View Post
                          Think about this because it is the direct answer to your problem accepting its existence: It is NOT a cohesive group or movement. Thats the point. And just like before...since there is no single man in charge or one singular direction IT MUST NOT EXIST!!!11!11!!!!
                          lolz

                          There are never going to be gigantic secret meetings with the grand poobah coordinating resistance movements across the country. What there will be is any number of groups loosely aligned by one thing: a concrete resolve to resist any and everything Trump related. Some will be violent. Some won't. Some will push hard for "X". Some will push hard for "Y".

                          The Alt-Left is just an opaque label for all of these things. Its not meant to be a label for some giant singular ubiquitous Lefty entity.
                          No one denies that those groups exist. Doesn't change the fact that the term "alt-left" is a fabrication from butthurt righties who got sad that the alt-right was getting bad press. You can keep repeating your nonsense backed by nothing but the right wing echo chamber....it changes nothing in reality.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            So to sum it up, there is no alt-left and no butt hurt. Nothing exists until its mentioned on CNN or MSNBC

                            Carry on

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by biker View Post
                              So to sum it up, there is no alt-left and no butt hurt. Nothing exists until its mentioned on CNN or MSNBC

                              Carry on

                              So just gonna ignore the fact that you are using the term to mean the opposite of what the vanity fare article says it means?

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                What's the big deal? So what if the government funded the development of the web, it's time to let the corporations set the rules and profit.

                                like the way Trump is aiming to keep government out of big ticket research and development whether scientific, medicine, space exploration or new technological infrastructure. Technology giants should build the artificially intelligent future. That way they can decide how to deploy it, when and at what cost. I trust Google, Verizon, ATT, Amazon, Facebook, Apple and Microsoft more than the government, Plus, it won

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X