Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Trump Voter intimidation commission

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by antknot View Post

    Shows they always planed to cheat.
    But how is it useful to the dems?

    Comment


    • #32
      You know it's more likely the whacky anti-government libertarians that are rescinding their registration, right?

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by posthuman View Post
        You know it's more likely the whacky anti-government libertarians that are rescinding their registration, right?
        Who even mentioned that?

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Captquint View Post

          Who even mentioned that?
          I'm talking to people that think the fraud commission is scaring away actual fraudulent registrations.

          Comment


          • #35
            Ahhhhhh

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by AnalHamster View Post

              Hooray for disenfranchisement, eh? Cretin.
              I dont believe everyone should vote. People without skin in the game and leach on social services have no business in getting the same voice as a productive member of society

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by biker View Post

                I dont believe everyone should vote. People without skin in the game and leach on social services have no business in getting the same voice as a productive member of society
                I'm a veteran and a productive member of society so I get 2 votes, right? And shouldn't my wife vote how I tell her anyway? 3 for me!

                But wait what if I'm a disabled veteran relying on SSI? Still 1 vote right? And then the second by proxy?

                Comment


                • #38
                  Yeah, my 86 year old grandma who never worked a paying job or had a drivers license is somehow less than a citizen.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by biker View Post

                    I dont believe everyone should vote. People without skin in the game and leach on social services have no business in getting the same voice as a productive member of society
                    Disenfranchise the poor and you just accelerate the growth of the gap between rich and poor, they already outnumber the rich. It's not sustainable, particularly when you let them all have guns.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Captquint View Post
                      Yeah, my 86 year old grandma who never worked a paying job or had a drivers license is somehow less than a citizen.
                      But she has SS though. Why should she get the same voice as I do?

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by AnalHamster View Post

                        Disenfranchise the poor and you just accelerate the growth of the gap between rich and poor, they already outnumber the rich. It's not sustainable, particularly when you let them all have guns.
                        Nah, in today's society and culture, the poor are pretty much comatose. Theyre too busy seeing what the Kardashians are doing to look up

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by biker View Post

                          But she has SS though. Why should she get the same voice as I do?
                          I don't see the gap there. From the beginning our nation allowed you to vote regardless of your actual production in society, so long as you owned land, which btw was practically free at the time.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by posthuman View Post

                            I don't see the gap there. From the beginning our nation allowed you to vote regardless of your actual production in society, so long as you owned land, which btw was practically free at the time.
                            Do you not think that appealing to voters these days is a race to the bottom?

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by biker View Post

                              But she has SS though. Why should she get the same voice as I do?
                              Because the fucking Constitution says she fucking does. What does Social Security have to do with voting?

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by Captquint View Post

                                Because the fucking Constitution says she fucking does. What does Social Security have to do with voting?
                                Constitution says no such thing, Capt. You should read it sometime

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X