Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Frustrated McCain unveils his own Afghanistan strategy

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by cigarettesandtea View Post
    I was wondering when you'd get to "the Jews did it."
    You might find this curious too... This and the above posts are the type stuff I look-into while you guys are playin' video games...

    Kay Griggs has had some interesting things to say about the inner-workings of the Zionist occupied government... Here is but one tasty morsel.

    "I believe my husband knew ahead of time 9/11 was going to occur... I am sure 9-11 was a joint and combined military operation, using boys who were recruited via A.Q. Khan's Israeli network in Pakistan and South Africa through Zionists in Hamburg. I believe that certain MI6 British Zionists with the Ian Goodwin-Peter Goodwin-Basil Cardinal Hume Yorkshire network were also involved in funding and recruiting these guys. It was a large and ongoing operation to set up and involved lots of CIA Zionists and lots of funny money." ... More
    ... then there's this which seems to have a curious connection to the murders involving the Clintons...

    "My former husband George, who is a trained assassin, calls the people he is involved with the members of The Firm or The Brotherhood. If you are in the clique, you are above the law and literally can get away with murder. For years, mostly when he was drinking, he told me how he and others in this elite military group would kill people," said Griggs, as she mentioned name after high-powered name and story after-detailed story about sexual perversion, murder, military hit squads, brainwashing and mind control, all activities sanctioned, participated in and condoned by a group of military and political elite... More
    Kay Griggs, Former Marine Colonel's Wife Talks Again About Military Assassin Squads, Drug Running, Illegal Weapon Deals And Sexual Perversion Deep Within The Highest Levels Of U.S. Military And Government... For 11 long years, Kay Griggs heard all the messy details from her military husband, usually while he was drinking before going into one of his drunken stupors. First going public in 1998 in an eight hour video interview with a truth-seeking Michigan pastor and FM radio broadcaster, she now is back after 9/11 to warn Americans to beware of the evil lurking within the highest levels of government, bound and determined to destroy America... More
    Kay Griggs: Colonel's Wife Deep State Tell-All Part 1 of 4
    .

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Heim View Post

      You might find this curious too... This and the above posts are the type stuff I look-into while you guys are playin' video games...

      Kay Griggs has had some interesting things to say about the inner-workings of the Zionist occupied government... Here is but one tasty morsel.



      ... then there's this which seems to have a curious connection to the murders involving the Clintons...





      Kay Griggs: Colonel's Wife Deep State Tell-All Part 1 of 4
      .
      Sounds to me like her husband enjoyed spinning yarns.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by posthuman View Post

        Sounds to me like her husband enjoyed spinning yarns.
        True or not when ever has big corporations, big money or big government ever let someone stand in their way.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Mr.Angry View Post

          True or not when ever has big corporations, big money or big government ever let someone stand in their way.
          The examples are the many stories of the greatest men and women the world has to offer.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by posthuman View Post
            Sounds to me like her husband enjoyed spinning yarns.
            MUCH of what she has said has been verified, only 'privately'... So, Mossad and CIA (a wholly owned deep-state subsidiary of Mossad), not only did in-fact have advance knowledge that the 911 attack was going to occur, they orchestrated it, propelling the USA into the wars in Afghanistan AND Iraq.

            I'd like to hear too, posthuman's explanation of how Building 7 in the World Trade Center Complex collapsed when it wasn't hit by an airplane. (Hint: the one hijacked aircraft that didn't make it to its Building 7 target crashed after the passengers attempted to physically subdue the hijackers, but Building 7 collapsed anyway).

            The evidence now seems to suggest, having operational bases withing striking distance of Iran; furthering the neo-con agenda and goal of destabilization of the area to advance the best interests of Israel was the chief objective of involving US military troops in what would become the Afghanistan and Iraq conflicts.

            Consider: 3 October 2007, General Wesley Clark said, "...After Afghanistan, the US would attack 7 countries in 5 years: Iraq , Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran..." ... His 'time-frame' may have been off, but little else.

            "...This country was taken over by a group of people with a policy coup: Wolfowitz and Cheney and Rumsfeld and you could name a half dozen others collaborators from the 'Project For A New American Century', they wanted us to destablize the Middle East, turn it upside down, make it under our control... Anybody ever told you that? Was there a national dialogue on this? ..." ~ General Wesley Clark, 3 October 2007.
            .



            Comment


            • #21
              The thing about people that like to spin yarns is they need an audience.

              Comment


              • #22
                Confirmed "privately?"

                Comment


                • #23
                  Wasn't the plane that crashed on its way to DC?

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by cigarettesandtea View Post
                    Wasn't the plane that crashed on its way to DC?
                    Forget it he's rolling

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by posthuman View Post
                      Confirmed "privately?"
                      That's right, privately. There are good people in the US government still, and some have had MUCH to say privately about how Mossad/CIA had advance knowledge of the 911 attack.

                      Originally posted by cigarettesandtea View Post
                      Wasn't the plane that crashed on its way to DC?
                      You're referring to its 'official' flight-planned destination, not the hijackers intended destination.

                      Originally posted by posthuman View Post
                      The thing about people that like to spin yarns is they need an audience.
                      We're still waiting on your explanation of the Building 7 collapse... You remember, the one that wasn't struck by an aircraft?

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Heim View Post

                        That's right, privately. There are good people in the US government still, and some have had MUCH to say privately about how Mossad/CIA had advance knowledge of the 911 attack.



                        You're referring to its 'official' flight-planned destination, not the hijackers intended destination.



                        We're still waiting on your explanation of the Building 7 collapse... You remember, the one that wasn't struck by an aircraft?
                        #1: If someone makes an outrageous claim they can't support, then comes back and makes an outrageous claim that they've had it confirmed but can't support it because it's "private", you've been lied to twice.

                        #2 no that's based on the flight path of the plane after it was hijacked.

                        #3 why would I engage in tinfoil conspiracies I have no interest in?

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by posthuman View Post
                          #1: If someone makes an outrageous claim they can't support, then comes back and makes an outrageous claim that they've had it confirmed but can't support it because it's "private", you've been lied to twice.
                          There's nothing outrageous about TRUTH... It surprises you that a US government employee doesn't want to reveal that the classified information he has access too confirms what some have already said publicly? ... The 911 episode is now the worst kept secret on the belt-line.

                          Originally posted by posthuman View Post
                          #2 no that's based on the flight path of the plane after it was hijacked.
                          Let the record show, the hijackers didn't file a flight plan.

                          Originally posted by posthuman View Post
                          #3 why would I engage in tinfoil conspiracies I have no interest in?
                          Why would you engage in intelligent dialogue at all? ... You take that 'UJ-UberGod' stuff way too seriously.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Heim View Post

                            There's nothing outrageous about TRUTH... It surprises you that a US government employee doesn't want to reveal that the classified information he has access too confirms what some have already said publicly? ... The 911 episode is now the worst kept secret on the belt-line.



                            Let the record show, the hijackers didn't file a flight plan.



                            Why would you engage in intelligent dialogue at all? ... You take that 'UJ-UberGod' stuff way too seriously.
                            #1ha ha

                            #2 the flight path after highjacking is determined by the transponder, not your stupid beliefs about flight plans

                            #3 I'm not an architect, I wasn't there, I don't know what happened and unless YOU can prove anything about it would change the realities of the rest of 9/11 then it's just a tinfoil hat conspiracy foisted on fools that don't know better themselves.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by posthuman View Post
                              #1ha ha
                              Point well taken, I take it.

                              Originally posted by posthuman View Post
                              #2 the flight path after highjacking is determined by the transponder, not your stupid beliefs about flight plans
                              The hijackers chose to crash the plane into the ground rather than risk the passengers and crew members retaking control of it. Flight 93 crashed in a field in rural Pennsylvania, near the tiny town of Shanksville, at 10:03 a.m., at a speed of around 580 miles per hour. Did your source suggest the transponder indicated otherwise?

                              Originally posted by posthuman View Post
                              #3 I'm not an architect, I wasn't there, I don't know what happened and unless YOU can prove anything about it would change the realities of the rest of 9/11 then it's just a tinfoil hat conspiracy foisted on fools that don't know better themselves.
                              Oh, you want evidence? ... Consider:

                              On September 11, 2001, the three worst structural failures in modern history took place when World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2, and 7 suffered complete and rapid destruction.

                              In the aftermath of the tragedy, most members of the architecture and engineering community, as well as the general public, assumed that the buildings' destruction had occurred as a result of the airplane impacts and fires. This view was reinforced by subsequent federal investigations, culminating in FEMA's 2002 Building Performance Study and in the 2005 and 2008 reports by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).

                              Since 9/11, however, independent researchers around the world have assembled a large body of evidence that overwhelmingly refutes the notion that airplane impacts and fires caused the destruction of the Twin Towers and WTC 7. This body of evidence, most of which FEMA and NIST omitted from their reports, instead supports the troubling conclusion that all three skyscrapers were destroyed in a process known as "controlled demolition," where explosives and/or other devices are used to bring down a building... Source
                              Yes, for the record, I remain skeptical too, but I can't explain the collapse of WTC7 otherwise.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Shanksville is on the way to DC, not New York, unless they were going to do a fly-by of DC on their way to New York.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X